Tag: securities

WOBURN, Mass., July 25, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- iSpecimen Inc. (Nasdaq: ISPC) (“iSpecimen” or the “Company”), an online global marketplace that connects scientists requiring biospecimens for medical research with a network of healthcare specimen providers, announced today the closing of its previously announced underwritten public offering of 5,714,283 shares of its common stock (or pre-funded warrants to purchase common stock in lieu thereof) at a public offering price of $0.70 per share (the “Offering”). The aggregate gross proceeds to the Company from the Offering was approximately $4 million, before deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other offering expenses.

Transaction in Own Shares

Revenue Growth of 17.6% to HK$78.7 Million (US$10.1 million); Strong Cash Position of HK$84.9 Million (US$10.9 million)

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Securities Litigation Partner James (Josh) Wilson Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses Exceeding $100,000 In Sarepta To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options

Revenue Growth of 17.6% to HK$78.7 Million (US$10.1 million); Strong Cash Position of HK$84.9 Million (US$10.9 million)

The combined company will operate under the name “ImageneBio, Inc.” and will begin trading on Nasdaq under the ticker symbol “IMA” at market open on Monday, July 28, 2025

The combined company will operate under the name “ImageneBio, Inc.” and will begin trading on Nasdaq under the ticker symbol “IMA” at market open on Monday, July 28, 2025

ATLANTA, July 25, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- A shareholder class action lawsuit has been filed against Replimune Group, Inc. (“Replimune” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: REPL). The lawsuit alleges that Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose material adverse information, including allegations that: (1) Defendants recklessly overstated the IGNYTE trial’s prospects, given material issues that defendants knew or should have known of, which resulted in the FDA deeming the IGNYTE trial inadequate and not well-controlled; and (2) as a result, defendants’ statements about Replimune’s business, operations, and prospects were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all times.