Tag: fraud

Why the TikTok Pink Salt Trick Went Viral in 2025 —and How ProZenith Offers a Science‑Based Solution for Hormonal Metabolic Support

NEW YORK, July 28, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Pomerantz LLP is investigating claims on behalf of investors of  Tesla, Inc. (“Tesla” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: TSLA). Such investors are advised to contact Danielle Peyton at newaction@pomlaw.com or 646-581-9980, ext. 7980.

SAN DIEGO, July 28, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP announces that purchasers or acquirers of Fiserv, Inc. (NYSE: FI) common stock between July 24, 2024 and July 22, 2025, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”), have until September 22, 2025 to seek appointment as lead plaintiff of the Fiserv class action lawsuit. Captioned City of Hollywood Police Officers’ Retirement System v. Fiserv, Inc., No. 25-cv-06094 (S.D.N.Y.), the Fiserv class action lawsuit charges Fiserv and certain of Fiserv’s top current and former executives with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

SAN FRANCISCO, July 25, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- On July 22, 2025, investors in Nutex Health Inc. (NASDAQ: NUTX) saw the price of their shares significantly fall after activist investment firm Blue Orca Capital published a critical report about Nutex and its involvement with independent dispute resolution (“IDR”) vendor HaloMD.

Investors can contact the law firm at no cost to learn more about recovering their losses

Investors can contact the law firm at no cost to learn more about recovering their losses

ATLANTA, July 25, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- A shareholder class action lawsuit has been filed against Replimune Group, Inc. (“Replimune” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: REPL). The lawsuit alleges that Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose material adverse information, including allegations that: (1) Defendants recklessly overstated the IGNYTE trial’s prospects, given material issues that defendants knew or should have known of, which resulted in the FDA deeming the IGNYTE trial inadequate and not well-controlled; and (2) as a result, defendants’ statements about Replimune’s business, operations, and prospects were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all times.