Tag: firm

NEW YORK, July 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Halper Sadeh LLC, an investor rights law firm, is investigating the following companies for potential violations of the federal securities laws and/or breaches of fiduciary duties to shareholders relating to:

Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. Litigation Partner Brandon Walker Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses In UroGen Pharma (URGN) To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options

SAN FRANCISCO, July 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Healthcare giant Centene Corporation (NYSE: CNC), a prominent provider of government-sponsored and commercial healthcare services, finds itself embroiled in a class action lawsuit following a dramatic plunge in its stock price. The suit, Lunstrum v. Centene Corporation, No. 25-cv-05659 (S.D.N.Y.), seeks to represent investors who purchased or acquired Centene securities between December 12, 2024, and June 30, 2025, alleging violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

NEW YORK, July 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The Gross Law Firm issues the following notice to shareholders of PepGen Inc. (NASDAQ: PEPG).

7 Breakout Projects Signal the Next Wave of Long-Term Crypto Value

NEW YORK, July 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Gainey McKenna & Egleston announces that a securities class action lawsuit has been filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan on behalf of all persons or entities who purchased or otherwise acquired Neogen Corporation (“Neogen” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: NEOG) securities between January 5, 2023 and June 3, 2025, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”).

ATLANTA, July 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- A shareholder class action lawsuit has been filed against Fortrea Holdings, Inc. (“Fortrea” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: FTRE). The lawsuit alleges that Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose material adverse information about Fortrea’s business, operations, and prospects, including allegations that: (i) Fortrea overestimated the amount of revenue the Pre-Spin Projects were likely to contribute to the Company’s 2025 earnings; (ii) Fortrea overstated the cost savings it would likely achieve by exiting the transition services agreements; (iii) as a result, Fortrea’s previously announced EBITDA targets for 2025 were inflated; and (iv) accordingly, the viability of the Company’s post-Spin-Off business model, as well as its business and/or financial prospects, were overstated.